Who this is relevant for
Our intended clients include people affected by serious state conduct, family representatives, human-rights defenders, cross-border legal teams and organisations. We prioritise transparent explanation of procedure over sensational claims of influence or guaranteed intervention.
Scope and procedure
The editorial method is evidence-first: confirm the alleged facts, identify rights and jurisdiction, separate mechanisms, explain limits and cite primary OHCHR materials. Country and mandate names may change, so the site is designed for regular updates instead of permanent promises about any particular expert.
Evidence, strategy and submission preparation
The website should display real lawyers' names, bar admissions, research qualifications and professional biographies only when approved and verified. Never fabricate a panel of ex-UN officials, case victories, client testimonials, partnerships, accreditations or database access.
Practical checklist
- Publish the exact registered legal entity and contact jurisdiction.
- Verify professional titles, admissions and regulatory authorisation.
- Explain the independence of the service from the United Nations.
- Name a responsible editor and a factual correction process.
- Link to a genuine privacy notice and transparent engagement terms.
Key considerations and documents
| Issue | What to verify |
|---|---|
| Mission | Clear, evidence-based navigation of international human-rights mechanisms. |
| Method | Fact verification, procedure screening and human legal review. |
| Independence | No UN affiliation, privileged channel or guaranteed intervention. |
| Accountability | Named operators, legal review and dated source updates before launch. |
What outcomes and limitations should you expect?
This draft contains no invented personnel, client outcomes or endorsements. Keep the page flagged for operator verification until actual identifying and licensing details have been supplied. Do not publish a fictitious biography to make the practice appear larger.
How our team can help
The firm or service provider must identify its actual responsible legal entity, the qualifications of its professionals and the limits of services offered. Prospective clients receive a clear description of the scope, confidentiality practices and potential conflicts before sensitive materials are requested.
Frequently asked questions
Are you part of OHCHR?
No. UN Human Rights Claims is an independent proposed service and resource.
Are your advisers licensed lawyers?
The final website must name the actual individuals and jurisdictions where regulated legal services are offered; this cannot be assumed in a draft.
Can you guarantee a letter from a Special Rapporteur?
No. All experts act independently and choose whether to send communications.
Request an assessment
Ask for the actual professional team, credentials and engagement terms when requesting an assessment.
Next step: Request a confidential case assessment.
Related pages
- International Human Rights Legal Services
- How We Prepare UN Human Rights Submissions
- Contact UN Human Rights Claims
Official references
Independent informational website. Not an official United Nations or OHCHR service. UN mechanisms assess matters independently; filing does not guarantee intervention, an outcome or a particular timeline.